ProudToBeCanadian
It's a question.
The latest from our COLUMNIST SECTION:
-
Thursday, Mar 18, 07:26 AM
Ann Coulter
My Healthcare Plan -
Wednesday, Mar 17, 09:51 AM
Barbara Kay
In support of a memorial to the victims of communism -
Wednesday, Mar 17, 09:42 AM
David Warren
Saint Patrick -
Tuesday, Mar 16, 06:53 PM
Theo Caldwell
Saint Patrick and the Selfless Life -
Monday, Mar 15, 09:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
Yes Massa -
Sunday, Mar 14, 09:36 AM
David Warren
Many ways to see the world -
Sunday, Mar 14, 09:31 AM
Doug Giles
Hey Obama, Keep Your Hands Off My Fishing Pole -
Saturday, Mar 13, 10:22 AM
Salim Mansur
Iraq stumbles toward democracy -
Saturday, Mar 13, 10:12 AM
David Warren
Icesave -
Friday, Mar 12, 08:43 AM
Susan Martinuk
Say you’re sorry—and then fix the system -
Thursday, Mar 11, 07:23 AM
Ann Coulter
What’s Arabic For ‘You’re No Atticus Finch’? -
Wednesday, Mar 10, 09:06 AM
Barbara Kay
Dropping the r-bomb -
Tuesday, Mar 09, 09:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
The Breyer Patch -
Monday, Mar 08, 09:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
The University of Notre Shame -
Sunday, Mar 07, 07:04 PM
David Warren
Tyranny of but -
Sunday, Mar 07, 07:18 AM
Doug Giles
Should Christians Use Saul Alinsky’s Tactics in Exposing Corruption? -
Saturday, Mar 06, 09:03 AM
Salim Mansur
Protect free speech, even if offensive -
Saturday, Mar 06, 07:45 AM
Rory Leishman
A rare display of political courage -
Saturday, Mar 06, 07:41 AM
David Warren
The pampered, privileged public service -
Friday, Mar 05, 09:21 AM
S. Wray Gregoire
Are We the World?
Click here to see more of our columns or use the drop-down menu atop this stack)
.jpg)
Free-Market Capitalist Consumer Information:
These companies choose to advertise on the
socialism-reliant CBC:
(Links lead to mailing addresses)
• AIG (insur)
• Air Canada
• AOL Travel
• Bank of Montreal ("BMO")
• Best Western
• Canada Protection Plan
• Canada Revenue Agency (!)
• Canadian Tire Fin Serv
• Chip Home Income Plan
• CIBC
• Cold FX
• Desjardins (insurance)
• Directbuy, Inc
• Edward Jones
• General Motors
• Grand and Toy
• Grey Power (insurance)
• H&R Block
• Hilton Hotels
• iContact email marketing
• Infinity (cars)
• Koodoo mobile
• Lens Crafters
• Monster.ca
• National Post
• Neutrogena
• Nutrisystem
• Quicktax
• RBC (Royal bank)
• Rogers Cable
• ScotiaBank
• Shaw Cable
• Texas Travel
• The Co-operators (ins)
• Tim Hortons
• Travelodge
• Vonage
• WeightWatchers
• Westjet
• Working.com
• Zip.ca
Please read more here.
PTBC J-Log
A conservative OPINION blog --with bite. OPINION by Joel Johannesen.Friday, May 29, 2009
When the liberals’ Toronto Star whacks Liberals and other socialists, you KNOW I’m obviously right.
Today’s Toronto Star lead editorial blasts Liberals and the you’ve got to be kidding party—both of which they normally, reflexively support no matter what, all day long. But it’s just for being intellectually dishonest children and misleading the Canadian people. (Not a deal-breaker for them).
Wanted: adult talk on deficits
May 28, 2009 04:30 AM
News that the federal government will run a deficit of $50 billion this year – not the previously forecast $34 billion – has prompted howls of outrage from the opposition parties.
Liberal finance critic John McCallum called the number “shocking.” NDP finance critic Thomas Mulcair awarded Finance Minister Jim Flaherty a “dunce cap.” Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff yesterday called for Flaherty to be fired.
The opposition should get a grip on itself. The deficit – while a “record” if inflation is unaccounted for – is a direct result not of Flaherty’s mismanagement but of the global recession, which has cut deeply into government revenues.
They’re partially right. I mean they’re totally right about the opposition being ignorant hypocritical and intellectually dishonest liars, but not so much on the singular cause of the deficit. Sure the excuse for the deficit is the global recession. But the cause — or as the TorStar puts it, the deficit being the “direct result” — was not of “the global recession”, but rather the result of political decisions based on what the Conservatives called “pragmatism”. Or what I call “liberalism”, because it wasn’t really all that “pragmatic” at all to be in a $50 BILLION deficit, now was it? The government could have cut spending and reduced the deficit to a fraction of what we’re facing today and as a further consequence, a fraction of what we’re going to face well into the future. That would have been pragmatic. And a “direct result” of principled conservatism.
• If you think this site is of no value, then don't pay anything for it, and it will fade into the sunset. That's capitalism at work.
•
• Category: Unsorted +

