ProudToBeCanadian
It's a question.
World Vision
The latest from our COLUMNIST SECTION:
-
Monday, Feb 08, 10:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
Queer Theories and Theologies -
Sunday, Feb 07, 09:24 AM
David Warren
Safe pregnancies for moms, babies -
Sunday, Feb 07, 09:23 AM
Doug Giles
National Prayer Breakfast: Obama Wants Civility Now, Dammit -
Saturday, Feb 06, 10:01 AM
Salim Mansur
Stifling free speech is not really free -
Saturday, Feb 06, 09:59 AM
David Warren
Back to the beginning -
Friday, Feb 05, 10:19 AM
Susan Martinuk
Many are to blame for false vaccine-autism link -
Friday, Feb 05, 10:15 AM
S. Wray Gregoire
Are We Too Comfortable? -
Thursday, Feb 04, 08:21 AM
Ann Coulter
Matthews and Olbermann Now Openly Fighting Over Obama -
Thursday, Feb 04, 06:51 AM
Ann Coulter
Can’t We At Least Get a Toaster? -
Wednesday, Feb 03, 08:40 PM
Theo Caldwell
The Super Bowl and the Contest of Life -
Wednesday, Feb 03, 12:25 PM
David Warren
Resisting temptation -
Tuesday, Feb 02, 10:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
Deep Thoughts on Coexistence -
Tuesday, Feb 02, 08:43 AM
Rebecca Hagelin
Teen Pregnancy Hype -
Monday, Feb 01, 10:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
Mosque University -
Sunday, Jan 31, 08:20 AM
David Warren
Laughing in the face of danger -
Sunday, Jan 31, 07:51 AM
Doug Giles
Bertha Lewis: O’Keefe’s Arrest Equals ACORN is Innocent (WTH?) -
Saturday, Jan 30, 06:28 PM
Joel Johannesen
Unlucky you. You are the 118th caller from the Conservative Party -
Saturday, Jan 30, 01:48 PM
Mike S. Adams
The Joke Ban -
Saturday, Jan 30, 09:58 AM
Salim Mansur
Dutch MP’s trial reminiscent of reporter’s post-9/11 writings -
Saturday, Jan 30, 09:52 AM
David Warren
Perpetual adolescence
Click here to see more of our columns or use the drop-down menu atop this stack)
.jpg)
Free-Market Capitalist Consumer Information:
These companies choose to advertise on the
socialism-reliant CBC:
(Links lead to mailing addresses)
• AIG (insur)
• Air Canada
• AOL Travel
• Best Western
• Canada Protection Plan
• Canada Revenue Agency (!)
• Canadian Tire Fin Serv
• Chip Home Income Plan
• CIBC
• Cold FX
• Desjardins (insurance)
• Directbuy, Inc
• Edward Jones
• General Motors
• Grand and Toy
• Grey Power (insurance)
• H&R Block
• Hilton Hotels
• iContact email marketing
• Infinity (cars)
• Koodoo mobile
• Lens Crafters
• Monster.ca
• National Post
• Neutrogena
• Nutrisystem
• Quicktax
• RBC (Royal bank)
• Rogers Cable
• ScotiaBank
• Shaw Cable
• Texas Travel
• The Co-operators (ins)
• Tim Hortons
• Travelodge
• Vonage
• WeightWatchers
• Westjet
• Working.com
• Zip.ca
Please read more here.
PTBC J-Log
A conservative OPINION blog --with bite. OPINION by Joel Johannesen.Friday, May 29, 2009
When the liberals’ Toronto Star whacks Liberals and other socialists, you KNOW I’m obviously right.
Today’s Toronto Star lead editorial blasts Liberals and the you’ve got to be kidding party—both of which they normally, reflexively support no matter what, all day long. But it’s just for being intellectually dishonest children and misleading the Canadian people. (Not a deal-breaker for them).
Wanted: adult talk on deficits
May 28, 2009 04:30 AM
News that the federal government will run a deficit of $50 billion this year – not the previously forecast $34 billion – has prompted howls of outrage from the opposition parties.
Liberal finance critic John McCallum called the number “shocking.” NDP finance critic Thomas Mulcair awarded Finance Minister Jim Flaherty a “dunce cap.” Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff yesterday called for Flaherty to be fired.
The opposition should get a grip on itself. The deficit – while a “record” if inflation is unaccounted for – is a direct result not of Flaherty’s mismanagement but of the global recession, which has cut deeply into government revenues.
They’re partially right. I mean they’re totally right about the opposition being ignorant hypocritical and intellectually dishonest liars, but not so much on the singular cause of the deficit. Sure the excuse for the deficit is the global recession. But the cause — or as the TorStar puts it, the deficit being the “direct result” — was not of “the global recession”, but rather the result of political decisions based on what the Conservatives called “pragmatism”. Or what I call “liberalism”, because it wasn’t really all that “pragmatic” at all to be in a $50 BILLION deficit, now was it? The government could have cut spending and reduced the deficit to a fraction of what we’re facing today and as a further consequence, a fraction of what we’re going to face well into the future. That would have been pragmatic. And a “direct result” of principled conservatism.
• If you think this site is of no value, then don't pay anything for it, and it will fade into the sunset. That's capitalism at work.
•
• Category: Unsorted +


.jpg)