ProudToBeCanadian
It's a question.
World Vision
The latest from our COLUMNIST SECTION:
-
Monday, Feb 08, 10:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
Queer Theories and Theologies -
Sunday, Feb 07, 09:24 AM
David Warren
Safe pregnancies for moms, babies -
Sunday, Feb 07, 09:23 AM
Doug Giles
National Prayer Breakfast: Obama Wants Civility Now, Dammit -
Saturday, Feb 06, 10:01 AM
Salim Mansur
Stifling free speech is not really free -
Saturday, Feb 06, 09:59 AM
David Warren
Back to the beginning -
Friday, Feb 05, 10:19 AM
Susan Martinuk
Many are to blame for false vaccine-autism link -
Friday, Feb 05, 10:15 AM
S. Wray Gregoire
Are We Too Comfortable? -
Thursday, Feb 04, 08:21 AM
Ann Coulter
Matthews and Olbermann Now Openly Fighting Over Obama -
Thursday, Feb 04, 06:51 AM
Ann Coulter
Can’t We At Least Get a Toaster? -
Wednesday, Feb 03, 08:40 PM
Theo Caldwell
The Super Bowl and the Contest of Life -
Wednesday, Feb 03, 12:25 PM
David Warren
Resisting temptation -
Tuesday, Feb 02, 10:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
Deep Thoughts on Coexistence -
Tuesday, Feb 02, 08:43 AM
Rebecca Hagelin
Teen Pregnancy Hype -
Monday, Feb 01, 10:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
Mosque University -
Sunday, Jan 31, 08:20 AM
David Warren
Laughing in the face of danger -
Sunday, Jan 31, 07:51 AM
Doug Giles
Bertha Lewis: O’Keefe’s Arrest Equals ACORN is Innocent (WTH?) -
Saturday, Jan 30, 06:28 PM
Joel Johannesen
Unlucky you. You are the 118th caller from the Conservative Party -
Saturday, Jan 30, 01:48 PM
Mike S. Adams
The Joke Ban -
Saturday, Jan 30, 09:58 AM
Salim Mansur
Dutch MP’s trial reminiscent of reporter’s post-9/11 writings -
Saturday, Jan 30, 09:52 AM
David Warren
Perpetual adolescence
Click here to see more of our columns or use the drop-down menu atop this stack)
.jpg)
Free-Market Capitalist Consumer Information:
These companies choose to advertise on the
socialism-reliant CBC:
(Links lead to mailing addresses)
• AIG (insur)
• Air Canada
• AOL Travel
• Best Western
• Canada Protection Plan
• Canada Revenue Agency (!)
• Canadian Tire Fin Serv
• Chip Home Income Plan
• CIBC
• Cold FX
• Desjardins (insurance)
• Directbuy, Inc
• Edward Jones
• General Motors
• Grand and Toy
• Grey Power (insurance)
• H&R Block
• Hilton Hotels
• iContact email marketing
• Infinity (cars)
• Koodoo mobile
• Lens Crafters
• Monster.ca
• National Post
• Neutrogena
• Nutrisystem
• Quicktax
• RBC (Royal bank)
• Rogers Cable
• ScotiaBank
• Shaw Cable
• Texas Travel
• The Co-operators (ins)
• Tim Hortons
• Travelodge
• Vonage
• WeightWatchers
• Westjet
• Working.com
• Zip.ca
Please read more here.
PTBC J-Log
A conservative OPINION blog --with bite. OPINION by Joel Johannesen.Friday, March 07, 2008
The 4 “conservative” MPs who voted against unborn children
Here are the four Conservative Party MPs who voted against the sane Unborn Victims of Crime Act, Bill C-484, which passed second reading in Parliament Wednesday. The Bill was put forward as a Private Members Bill by Conservative MP Ken Epp.

Gordon O’Connor of Carleton-Mississippi Mills in Ontario
Lawrence Cannon of Pontiac in Québec
Sylvie Boucher of Beauport-Limoilou in Québec
Josée Verner of Louis-Saint-Laurent in Québec
Two of the four are Conservative Cabinet Ministers who also fought traditional marriage and voted to alter the definition of marriage. Cannon is Transportation Minister, and Verner is Minister of International Cooperation. Verner is staunchly pro-abortion and pro-euthanasia MP.
(Hat tip to LifeSiteNews.com, and article from whom I garnered all of the above information. LifeSiteNews.com)
Today’s challenge of the day: Explain to me how they are “conservative”. All four of them are what I’d describe not as “conservative”, but rather as “despicable”. Again that’s “despicable”. Forget the challenge of the day. I’m done with it.
The Unborn Victims of Crime Act seeks to properly recognize unborn children as crime victims when they are injured or killed during the commission of an offense against their mothers. And that is not a “conservative” notion. That’s just “sane”. It’s not good, it’s merely adequate.
I will never understand the mentality of those who would protect what they must see as the right (?) of people to injure or kill unborn babies. I could be wrong but I guess they believe it’s one of those “Canadian Values” that the Canadian liberal-left are always on about.
Some people who are against this bill say they are concerned it is a possible encroachment of their pro-abortion, um, “principles”, and the related “Canadian Value” of limitless, no-questions-asked, any time in any pregnancy—even at 9-months—abortion for any or no reason whatsoever, at taxpayer expense, which has been supported by all the main political parties including the Conservative Party.
(As those of us in the sensible set know, abortion is the most disgusting, most egregious thing ever thought of by humans.)
Of course if that’s their position in being against this Act, it is bunkum. Voluntary abortion or any act or omission by the mother are specifically exempted in the legislation.
It is a weird thing that while pro-abortion folks all prefer to call themselves pro-choice, it may also be a total lie. They only seem to be interested in protecting the rights of women who choose to abort—not those who choose to keep their babies. And they clearly think nothing of the rights of the innocent, unborn child, who I’m pretty sure choose to live as a general matter. So they’re not pro-choice as much as they are, as I said, pro-abortion.
Some of these people are self-described “conservatives”. Right.
It must be very hard to be a liberal. I feel sorry for them.
• If you think this site is of no value, then don't pay anything for it, and it will fade into the sunset. That's capitalism at work.
•
• Category: Unsorted +
COMMENTS
Comments do not necessarily reflect or in any way represent the opinion of the main blog entry writer or owner of this site, and claims to the contrary are spurious. Distasteful, abusive, hateful, or annoying remarks will likely be deleted; but since this is a relatively open forum, bad comments may accidentally remain on this site. The fact that a comment remains does not indicate an endorsement of the views.-
There are no comments for this entry yet.


.jpg)