SUPPORT PTBC
with this PTBC site-nourishing,
national pride-inducing purchase

Liberals can buy the pin too!

---

• Members:

---

• Help us fight
the good conservative fight!

PTBC totally relies on YOUR cash contributions.

---

• About PTBC

First: It's a question.

Other than that: A true conservative site that helps explain the difference between liberals and conservatives. We're:
Pro-life. Pro-freedom. Pro-USA. Pro-Christian. Pro-Israel. Pro-family. Pro-traditional marriage. Pro-free market capitalism. Pro-war-on-terror and war on Islamofascism and terror in Iraq and everywhere else. Pro-military. We're for smaller governments. For less taxes. Against socialism. Against state-owned or state-run media. Against asinine state controls on our legal gun ownership. Against the so-called "progressive", left-wing church of liberalism. Against idiocy generally. ...Read more...

---

• Worst Canadians

• An apparently typical state-owned CBC fan, on news of the death of a Canadian soldier in Afghanistan:
"THIS IS WHAT YOU DESERVE"
(Also see PTBC's CBC reader comments of hate category).

• As taxpayers bail out the auto companies in Canada, the head of the auto workers' union in Canada, Ken Lewenza, blames Canada's "right wing" (that's me) and "corporate agenda" (arguably also me) for the global financial collapse, in what I call (A) an outright lie, (B) yet another declaration of class warfare in Canada by the extreme left, and (C) overall abject stupidity. He also (D) sounds like a communist. Reference.

---

---

• Search PTBC

Advanced Search

• CBC -related blog entries
• CBC reader comments of hate

---

• Syndicate

• Blackberries, mobiles etc.:
  http://ptbc.mobi/
• RSS 2.0
• Atom

      ProudToBeCanadian

It's a question.

PTBC J-Log

A conservative OPINION blog --with bite. OPINION by Joel Johannesen.

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC"

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

State-owned CBC:  commenting CBC fans wish Dick Cheney dead; hope he dies in pain.  APPROVED by CBC.

I mentioned yesterday that Vice President Cheney had checked himself into the hospital due to chest pains, and teased that the extremist left-wingers and haters at the CBC web site would soon be hoping for his painful death, and naturally I was spot on as always.

I’ve categorized some of the comments I found at that hate-filled, state-owned, taxpayer-funded CBC web site.

From my reading over the years, virtually all CBC fans think (in lockstep, or rather in goosestep fashion) that President Bush and Vice President Cheney are “war criminals”.  All extreme leftist idiots I’ve ever listened to uniformly think this way.  But whatever he is, he needs to die, if I understand the CBC commenters correctly.  The fact that the CBC moderators approve of these comments makes them accomplices.

LEFT-WING GENIUS WAR CRIMES JUDGES OF ALL GET OUT:

· cprtrain wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 9:17 PM ET
This idiot should be in jail and not a hospital. He is a war criminal and is responsible for the US being in Iraq.
64Agree 10Disagree

· BentWang wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:36 PM ET
Let us make sure this war criminal lives long enough to stand trial.
15Agree 5Disagree

· HumptyD wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 11:53 PM ET
Well I hope Dick has a full recovery. I know it won’t happen but I always wished to see him and his puppet Dubya, in shackles at The Hague.
1Agree 1Disagree

· RALPH120 wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 11:57 PM ET
What a scare!
Don’t go ... yet, Dick “Tojo” Cheney.
You need to answer for your war crimes with your neocon buddies at the upcoming trial…
1Agree 1Disagree

AND IN THE GIMME JUST ONE ORIGINAL THOUGHT CATEGORY:

· JohnMeyer wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 9:18 PM ET
Well at least they won’t have to waste time checking for a heart.
Cheers,
John Meyer
56Agree 4Disagree

· mkconnie wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 9:21 PM ET
What? Cheney has a heart?
55Agree 5Disagree

· Pete from Scarborough wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 9:53 PM ET
Cheney has a heart?
32Agree 9Disagree

· WinkDinkerson wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:01 PM ET
Cheney has a heart?
I predict the above statement will be said at least 10 times in this thread.
19Agree 4Disagree

· KC3707 wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:34 PM ET
Obvious misdiagnosis. Dick Cheney does not have a heart.
15Agree 3Disagree

ON THE RELIGIOUS-LEFT FRONT:

Ahhh.  This explains why they’re atheists.  Because if there was a “god”, he’d murder Dick Cheney just for kicks.  Now get back to your CBC-readin’, Hank Ford and FarLeft!

· Hank Ford wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 9:19 PM ET
One reason I can’t believe in god is that if he existed, Cheney would not. He is scum, responsible for war crimes, and no loss to this world. Sorry, but that the way it is. Maybe when he does croak, he can get together with Saddam and find those missing wmd program in the nebulous future ready to strike American any minute smoking gun bullsh#t.
55Agree 10Disagree

· FarLeft wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 9:25 PM ET
“Cheney has had four heart attacks, starting when he was 37. He has had quadruple bypass surgery and two artery-clearing angioplasties.”
——————
Obviously, God is trying to get rid of this man.
46Agree 6Disagree

LEFTIST CAPITALIST GENIUSES:

· I’m Listening wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 9:55 PM ET
Guess Haliburton stock must of plunged…
27Agree 4Disagree

(sorry — there was only one financial genius)

ON THAT FAMOUS LIBERAL-LEFT COMPASSION AND LOVE OF OUR FELLOW HUMANS:

· AnotherPerspective wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:05 PM ET
I hope it hurts…. a lot!
19Agree 6Disagree

· SNAFOO wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:08 PM ET
Oh my! I hope he doesn`t recover soon…..
14Agree 7Disagree

· Wuzupdawk wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:04 PM ET
I understand completely why comments are pre-moderated. Most Canadians would be disappointed to hear Cheney is recovering—- I am no different. He has done much irreversible harm to this world.
22Agree 7Disagree

THIS IS HOW LIBERAL ARGUE FOR GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH INSURANCE:

· Hubris Hunter wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:25 PM ET
As if for a cruel exclamation mark the brutal ugliness is he would of been dead at 37 if he was one of the millions without health insurance…...
7Agree 3Disagree

· CynicalDragon wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:36 PM ET
obviously due to the reaction he had when he heard of Obamas new health care plans.
3Agree 0Disagree

· Dr. Wayne wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 11:19 PM ET
Now isn’t modern medicine a marvel ... for some.
0Agree 0Disagree

· ThePaz wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 11:24 PM ET
Wonder if his health insurance is up to date?
4Agree 0Disagree

· WESTER wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 11:50 PM ET
And right below the headline “Obama unveils newest health-care plan.”
Well-placed, CBC, the irony is delicious.
1Agree 0Disagree

MISCELLANEOUS LIBERAL-LEFT HATE:

· Burning Hazard wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:46 PM ET
They should send him to the Great Wizard of Oz for the first diagnosis…
2Agree 1Disagree

· ExSaskie wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 10:49 PM ET
I was always taught if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing.
So…..
2Agree 4Disagree

· 48beepguin wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 11:10 PM ET
I guess hunter friend he shot finally fired back. It’s not the heart, its the lead pellets in his chest.
3Agree 0Disagree

· Tangaihua wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 11:19 PM ET
Should send him to a hospital in Iraq….I’m sure they would put in something that would tick much better….tick..tick..tick…\
2Agree 0Disagree

· catapleiite wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 11:34 PM ET
He should have checked in a hospital in Baghdad.
1Agree 0Disagree

Before I went to bed, there were also four normal thoughts in which folks wished Cheney well, and pointed out how utterly full of hate and bile the commenters at the CBC web site were.  Maybe the CBC didn’t approve the rest of them. 

UPDATE:  The death-wish continues Tuesday morning

Here’s another rather typical lunatic from the CBC commenting section:

· TheFacts wrote:Posted 2010/02/23 at 10:59 AM ET
Cheney the mastermind behind 9/11
The warmonger and war crimminal who murdered over 1/2 million Iraqis
He should be in jail together with Bush, Rumsfeld, Blair, Wolfowitz, Rice and all tha PANAC terrorists
But since there is no real justice in this world .... when is turn comes he will rot in hell
3Agree 3Disagree

· SmedleyButler wrote:Posted 2010/02/23 at 10:21 AM ET
Dear Dick,
Please die soon and make the world a better place.
Thanks,
Smedley
P.S. RIP?!?!?! I hope those old bones are desecrated daily.
13Agree 8Disagree

The above comment was APPROVED by the CBC.

· Houseman wrote:Posted 2010/02/23 at 9:39 AM ET
The sooner he takes the count, the better. Unfortunately, his daughter is planning on entering federal politics. If it’s not one Cheney, it’s another.
R.I.P., Dick. Soon.
4Agree 6Disagree

· anti_CCRAP wrote:Posted 2010/02/23 at 12:45 AM ET
I am always amused to read stories about Cheney.. specially those about his “heart”... particularly the nasty empty space in his chest cavity where most humans usually have one.
29Agree 5Disagree

· ravnlghtft wrote:Posted 2010/02/23 at 12:43 AM ET
Think he’ll live long enough to face the The Hague?
29Agree 4Disagree

· michael971 wrote:Posted 2010/02/23 at 12:16 AM ET
I wouldn’t miss him I think the world would be a better place. Would you?
34Agree 9Disagree

· OliverH wrote:Posted 2010/02/23 at 12:14 AM ET
FarLeft wrote:Posted 2010/02/22 at 9:25 PM ET: “Obviously, God is trying to get rid of this man.”
Assuming God exists. With a record of 0-4, God = FAIL
17Agree 8Disagree

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC"

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Plane crashes into IRS building: CBC fans reflexively blame “right-wingers”, “teabaggers”.

CBC radical leftists and idiots are racing to post their BLAME RIGHT-WINGERS! screed on the taxpayer-paid state-owned CBC web site, for the benefit of all Canadians.  (Avoid the CBC’s ridiculous version:  Read the story here). 

For extra amusement, the usual number of the totally irrational left-wing 9/11 ‘Truthers’ add to the CBC mix, in addition to one who calls this a “patriotic” (not terrorist!) act, and uses the CBC web site to publicly call for this just sort of “patriotic” violent uprising against business, or at least banks in particular.  And naturally, one calls the pilot a crazy “teabagger”, using the most despicable, derogatory term possible to describe at least half of America, which apparently the CBC has decided — perhaps in a committee setting — to officially approve, when used by its delightful commenters against conservatives and normal — non-progressive — concerned Americans.  And one thinks the homicidal pilot is actually a sort of a “martyr” to the cause, like the Islamofascist, homicide bomber/terrorists all think they are “martyrs”.

CBC approves all these:

• MenoKnight wrote:Posted 2010/02/18 at 12:30 PM ET
They say on CNN it is an IRS building.
A crazy Tea Party Nut?

• Pedestrian wrote:Posted 2010/02/18 at 12:35 PM ET
So why hasn’t the building collapsed in to it’s own footprint yet? It’s been burning for quite a long time, and my understanding of the Official Truth has always been that buildings collapse at the rate of free fall after events like this.

• MenoKnight wrote:Posted 2010/02/18 at 1:07 PM ET
CNN says It was a man with a grudge against the IRS
Just like a said, a tea party nut.

• Albertakid wrote:Posted 2010/02/18 at 1:10 PM ET
Not Terrorism, but patriotism. How long can people watch the government steal their hard-earned money and give it to their bankster friends? There needs to be an uprising of the middle class before there is no middle class left.

• Dice_K wrote:Posted 2010/02/18 at 1:10 PM ET
Hmm. On 9/11, building 7 “collapsed” and wasn’t even struck. Wonder if this building is made of tougher cardboard?

• Quasimodem wrote:Posted 2010/02/18 at 1:28 PM ET
Sure, I’ll go out on a limb and make a prediction without sufficient evidence, I think they will find that the pilot was a wild and crazy teabagger. One of Glenn Beck’s constant listeners.

• dizzydz wrote:Posted 2010/02/18 at 2:39 PM ET
Don’t waste your time with the terrorist theories. The guy has had a long running dispute with the real terrorists, the `Federal Taxman’ the ones who bleed us dry to subsidize the Halliburtons, Bechtels, Blackwaters, and GM’s of the world. Rest in Peace brother, your sacrifice will be remembered as those of a martyr.

Maybe the CBC fans should have read this part of the pilot’s suicide note, in which he apparently reveals himself to have been sort of the opposite of what the CBC commenters think —he actually seems to be a rabid anti-capitalist who reveres the lefts’ Marxist motto, and hates capitalism:

Not that it matters what side he’s on. He’s a murderer, either way.

Naturally, the socialism-reliant CBC doesn’t bother to include that tidbit of socialist credo, though, which is worth pointing out. 

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC"

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Hateful CBC commenter admits his HATRED of Israel.  CBC approves comment.

With the CBC’s help (or aid and comfort, you might say), these people from the “peace-loving”, “tolerant”, “compassionate”, “nuanced” and “intelligent” set are becoming more and more brash — sort of Ahmadinejadian in this example — in their abject displays of hatred and idiocy.  On your dime of course. 

As if to openly confirm, once again, my repeated claims that the state-owned, taxpayer-funded CBC’s well-nurtured left-wing extremist audience is full of haters and intolerant left-wing asses, today we find one who actually types out the words —and naturally the CBC approves it. 

“...by the way…I HATE ISRAEL…”

...Which obviates another round of our fun little game!
Let’s play!
What if he said he hated GAY PEOPLE?!
Well that was fun.

The jerk who calls himself “GeraldMcIvor” at the CBC site wins our Worst Canadian of the Week Award.  Actually he shares it with the state-owned CBC itself.  Worst Canadians of the Week.  Marvy.

But at least this open hatred helps us understand the progressives —the liberal-left or extreme left, and one of their primary enablers, the CBC, better.  Straining to find an upside, I guess we could say that they are at least providing a valuable political service of sorts to normal Canadians regarding how liberals and progressives think.  Not that we should pay them for it, as we are (I mean no taxpayers pay me to explain how conservatives think, after all).

I should note that the hater then uses his tool (by which I mean the CBC, but I do understand the confusion) to blithely go on to accuse the Israelis of genocide (not even adding “alleged”?), and adds of course that Israel was aided and abetted in the “genocide” by our own country, and of course the even more hated U.S.  No word on his hatred of Canada and the U.S., but I presume, following his own logic, that he holds an identical sentiment:  HATRED.

 

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC"

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Taliban leader caught? Therefore, CBC’s left-wing nutbars come out of their rat holes in protest.

File this under the heading “Where did they learn this?”  Or you may choose the heading “At the CBC”.

Only extreme left-wing zealots and nuts could possibly come up with the kind of deranged drivel you find in the comments at the state-owned, taxpayer-funded representation of Canada: the CBC and its despicable web site.  And it could be credibly argued, this could only occur if the web site welcomed this level of idiotspeak and left-wing, Bush-hating discourse, and let it occur, over and over, thereby actually encouraging it.

On the news article today about the savage Islamofascist terrorist Taliban leader being arrested (unfortunately not shot dead) in Pakistan, within minutes, two comments appeared reading: “What about Chenney, Rumsfeld and Bush ?”

Never mind that President Obama, Vice President Biden, and Defense Secretary Gates have more troops deployed there than Bush did.  The fact that CBC readers so often view President Bush, Vice President “Chenney”, and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in exactly the same light as savage Islamofascist terrorist Taliban leaders who gave aid and comfort to savages who declared war on America and the west killing thousands of innocent Americans and Canadians and others in a brutal attack, while at the same time slaughtering innocents in Afghanistan to take over that country, raping and torturing women and children along the way… tells us all we need to know about following the state-owned, taxpayer-funded CBC has managed to nurture and encourage with our government’s blessing.  For us and our children and families and all the world to see. 

But worried that he didn’t seem to get his message across, he submitted it again, and again it was allowed to be presented to the world on “our” website (once again spelling “Chenney” like an uneducated ignoramus). 

Note that the CBC moderates and approves the comments at the CBC prior to their being posted. 

This is the same CBC web site where I found the words, in a comment posted at an article about a Canadian soldier dying in the fight in Afghanistan, “THIS IS WHAT YOU DESERVE”.  And others like that.

Unlike the “Official Languages Commissioner” who will “investigate” the amount of French being spoken at the Olympian government games,  there is no oversight whatsoever, apparently, prepared to “investigate” the far-left extremist sentiment being nurtured at the state-owned, taxpayer-funded CBC. 

All the political parties in Canada support the CBC, including the Conservative Party;  as do many companies and organizations, including the Canadian military and the RCMP, who support it through their advertising.  Yet it is web sites like this one — ProudToBeCanadian — which they deem too “extreme” to advertise on or support in any way, shape, or form.  God bless ‘em.

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Thursday, January 21, 2010

John Edwards: liberal, liar, cheater;  CBC fans: liberal, liberal, liberal

On news that one of their own, John Edwards, another Democratic Party liar and cheater, has been caught with her his pants down, the CBC fans rush to his defense.

ACTUAL CBC COMMENT:

ShaMan1961 wrote:Posted 2010/01/21 at 4:53 PM ET

I always find it amazing how the private life of their public figures seems to matter so much to the average American. I personally couldn’t care less if our prime minister would bed a different person (man or woman) every month.

Oh how trendy and libertine —and ever so properly politically-correct in its asexual or bi-sexual or group sex (not sure —he’s a liberal) reference.  How European and modern and liberal and sophisticated and progressive and moreover,  quintessentially CBC.  And by the way, what BS, as long as the prime minister is a Conservative.

Also note that the stupid CBC story misses half the point, which is the investigation regarding whether he fraudulently used campaign funds to pay her off, for which, if convicted, the “green” advocate and “man-made global warming” alarmist would be forced to leave his mansion carved out of once pristine forest, and live in jail for several years.

EXTRA READING
Ann Coulter columns:
• Only His Hair Dresser Knows for Sure!
• Even By Trial Lawyer Standards, Edwards A Real Sleazebag
• A Baby Daddy For Both Americas

News articles:
• BREAKING NEWS: John Edwards denies affair with campaign worker
• Edwards Admits Sexual Affair; Lied as Presidential Candidate
• John Edwards admits fathering child with videographer

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

The mostest intellectualestest left-wing CBC comments re Repub win in Mass: “Yu american’s R Stupid”

Here’s a small sampling of some of the hateful comments on one of the most divisive, hateful web sites in all of North America, the state-owned, taxpayer-funded CBC, which represents all of us to the world. 

Mostly, the CBC fans reason, if a left-wing candidate didn’t win as in Massachusetts, it’s simply because all Americans are stupid, beyond, in some cases, even being valid as human beings.  And (related) possibly worse, they’re also Christians.  Most of the comments from these far-left extremists are moronic, and all contain multiple spelling and grammar mistakes. almost as if the folks who wrote them were educated by the CBC and/or state-run public schools.  All these comments were approved by the taxpayer-funded CBC moderators. 

All of the above-mentioned irony flies quickly over the heads of the CBC and its commenting fans.

yoggii wrote:  “I can’t believe the absolute stupidity of the Americans.”

proudcanuckmutt wrote: “...the Republicans are uniformly right wing extremists and Christian fundementalists.”

This next one makes an absolutely direct comparison between all conservatives in Canada to Hitler’s Nazis and the Third Reich, and says that they are indecent unethical humans, and yet it is deemed perfectly acceptable by the CBC moderators:

True North wrote: “One would think that if the reich wing had any shame they would stop their gutter politics and behave like decent, ethical human beings.”

ThePaz wrote: “Once again the American citizenry continues to show it’s ignorance by electing those who will in time lead the USA to self-destruct…”

NoContest wrote:  “I can only feel sorry for a people for so long.”

This complete idiot can’t spell and is truly suffering.  But the fact that the state-owned, taxpayer-funded CBC moderators allow vile sexual references about a whole group of people, like calling millions of Americans “Tea Baggers”, is beyond disgraceful.  (But it does befit the CBC.)  I include a helpful link to the definition of the term “tea bagger” for the benefit of the CBC and its hater fan base.

True North (also) wrote:  “...if you think that a bunch of racist, gun tottin’ Tea Baggers led by Sarah Palin are the answer to America’s problems then you don’t know squat. Intelligent voters usually try to pick the best and the brightest candidates to lead their country. Putting power in the hands of stupid, delusional people is a decidely right wing trait. And even their standards are constantly dropping. First Reagan, then Bush and now Palin.”

catapleiite wrote: “American people are nice people, easy to brainwash and manipulate….”

PutinFan wrote: “This only proves that Obama = Bush = leader of the MOST evil & corrupt society the world has ever known. Support only those who seek to destroy America.” 

Cry4Canada wrote: “It amazes me the stupidity of some people.”

DanaChan wrote:  “I must be missing something. Americans can’t be THAT stupid ...”

JohnABC wrote: “maybe 48% are informed the other 52% must have believe the $100 Million ad campaign (lies and propaganda) from the Big Medical Insurance Companies”

“Joel 123” would love “John ABC” (above) to read these articles which the CBC never, ever remotely touched, ever: 
• Martha Coakley Attends Fund Raiser with Insurance and Drug Company Lobbyists
• Pelosi to attend fund-raiser hosted by villainous health care lobbyist

And in the next comment, “jSpracklin” muses about intelligence and “replublicans” and how “replublicans” are “lunatics”, yet says he’s “moving to the moon” if Palin or Limbaugh become president…But jSpracklin’s still not going to be a lunatic….

jSpracklin wrote: “5. If either Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, or any of these other lunatic replublicans end up US President, I’m moving to the moon. ... P.S. The words “intelligent” and “republican” don’t belong in the same sentence.” 

This next one blames the Haiti crisis on “Bush’s tax cuts for the rich”!

Passionate Canadian wrote:  “Look at Haiti: it is what it is because of the business-friendly cutting tax governments installed by USA over the last 95 years.”

GarryHall wrote: “The Republicans are once again showing themselves to be selfish, mean spirited and stupid. You know, like Sarah Palin.”

This next guy really upset me emotionally and made me feel badly because I bought the Shamwow (it’s fantastic!), and so I’m going to report him to the liberal-left’s “human rights” commissions: 

rtc100 wrote: “People who can think for themselves do not buy Slap Chops or Sham-Wows. They also don’t vote for male centerfolds or cheerleaders from Alaska. If they actually educated people the entire consumer economy would collapse.”

So as you can now see thanks to “rtc100”, capitalists are stupid, communists are smart!  Communists can think for themselves!  (—if authorized to do so.)

Wait!  There’s more!  The CBC has so many fans!

mgcatfish wrote:  “What a bunch of morons, buying into the neo-cons’ fear tactics!”

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Monday, January 11, 2010

UPDATED:  Sarah Palin to join Fox News Channel as a contributor

Originally posted at 12:41 PM, Mon Jan 11

Oh I can’t WAIT to see how liberals and socialists/communists react.  I’m sure it will be tolerant!  Because they’re liberals!  They’re all about the tolerance! 

...developing….

UPDATES:

Palin to Join Fox News as Contributor
FOXNews.com

2008 Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin is joining Fox News as a contributor, the news channel announced Monday.

The former Alaska governor, whose book, Going Rogue: An American Life, became a bestseller weeks before it was released and remains No. 2 on the New York Times bestseller list, has signed a multi-year deal to offer her political commentary and analysis across all Fox News platforms, including Fox Business Channel, FoxNews.com and Fox News Radio.

She will also participate in special event political programming for Fox Broadcasting.

“I am thrilled to be joining the great talent and management team at Fox News. It’s wonderful to be part of a place that so values fair and balanced news,” Palin said in a written release.

Palin will also host periodic episodes of Fox News Channel’s “Real American Stories,” a series exploring inspirational real-life tales of overcoming adversity throughout the American landscape that will debut in 2010.

“Governor Palin has captivated everyone on both sides of the political spectrum and we are excited to add her dynamic voice to the FOX News lineup,” said Bill Shine, executive vice president of programming. ...

Latest available viewership stats for cable news channels:

Prime Time, Thursday January 7 2010
Fox News Channel – 2.357,000 viewers
CNN – 573,000 viewers
MSNBC – 767,000 viewers
CNBC – a scratch w/110,000 viewers
Headline news Network – 757,000 viewers

Some Key Time Slots (and age groups):

5PM (2 PM Pacific)  – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Fox News Channel – Glenn Beck – 2,601,000 viewers (703,000) (1,259,000)
CNN – Situation Room—814,000 viewers (127,000) (266,000)
MSNBC – Hardball —680,000 viewers (121,000) (331,000)
CNBC – Fast Money —181,000 viewers (a scratch w/53,000) (94,000)

8PM (5 PM Pacific)  – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Fox News Channel – The O’Reilly Factor Special – 3,415,000 viewers (848,000) (1,584,000)
CNN – Campbell Brown – 588,000 viewers (156,000) (275,000)
MSNBC – Countdown w/ K. Olbermann – 1,036,000 viewers (289,000) (589,000)
CNBC – American Greed – 167,000 viewers (57,000) (82,000)
Headline News Network – Nancy Grace – 974,000 viewers (303,000) (489,000)

9 PM (6 PM Pacific)  – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Fox News Channel – Hannity – 2,024,000 viewers (517,000) (949,000)
CNN – Larry King Live —561,000 viewers (136,000) (248,000)
MSNBC – Rachel Maddow Show —790,000 viewers (236,000) (437,000)
CNBC – Macheads — a scratch w/73,000 viewers (a scratch w/28,000) (a scratch w/36,000)
Headline News Network – Joy Behar- 847,000 viewers (278,000) (436,000)

10 PM (7 PM Pacific)  P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Fox News Channel – On the Record w/ Greta—1,623,000 viewers (419,000) (737,000)
CNN – Anderson Cooper 360 — 568,000 viewers (145,000) (270,000)
MSNBC – Countdown w/ K. Olbermann – 475,000 (170,000) (243,000)
CNBC – Planet of the Apps – a scratch w/91,000 viewers (57,000) (61,000)
Headline News Network – Nancy Grace –502,000 viewers (226,000) (269,000)

Those numbers notwithstanding….
CBC fans chime in with examples of their tolerance!:

InvermereBoy wrote:Posted 2010/01/11 at 5:03 PM ET
“Neo-cons are happy…they’re the only ones who watch FOX ...” 

(38 fellow CBC fans clicked the “I agree!” button on that one).

This next one calls those who are “extreme” right wingers like Sarah Palin and those of us who like her, “mentally challenged”.  They skillfully avoided “retarded”.  Because they’re so polite and tolerant.  I love it when they try to be politically correct even as they display their abject bigotry.  .... And then they insinuate that Palin will induce a group sex masturbation-oriented show, and the state-paid CBC moderators naturally approved that…

Sentient Human wrote:Posted 2010/01/11 at 5:25 PM ET
“...She will be right at home amongst the other mentally challenged Extreme Right-Wingers who are unable to comprehend what the Constitution and America are really about.

What are they going to call the show? Perhaps the ‘Inner Circle (Jerk)’ would be an appropriate title? ... “

Yahoo Answers:  “what is a circle jerk?”  ... or just ask the CBC staff.  Surely they know what they’re approving on behalf of taxpayers. 

This one calls her a WHORE.  Not even softening it with “media whore”.  Simply a whore… and CBC approves it:

VideoNick56 wrote:Posted 2010/01/11 at 7:22 PM ET Paulhill wrote:
“... excuse me. I feel a sneeze coming on…ahh…ahhhH ahhHHHH-WHORE!! ...”

That same genius thinker alludes to how sexually stimulating he finds her.  CBC not only approves that, they LOVE that.  They hate it when women are seen as “sex objects”.... except when it’s Sarah Palin.  Then they love it.  Love it! 

VideoNick56 wrote:Posted 2010/01/11 at 7:14 PM ET:
“... Well, now that you mention it, despite being blissfully free from the burden of intelligent thought, she actually is somewhat sexually intriguing…..hmmmm….. “

INTERMISSION
As I’m reading the idiots’ comments at CBC, I’m watching Fox News Channel, where, as usual, Bill O’Reilly is interviewing his perpetual guest Marc Lamont Hill—an avowed far-left socialist (no, not “just” a socialist —a real hard-left socialist.  And a Fox News Contributor, just like Sarah Palin now is.  He’s on Fox News Channel nearly every day.  Probably more than Sarah Palin will be.  And so are other leftists.  That’s partly how we in the smart set understand what the left’s up to.  CBC fanboys have utterly no clue… and yet they call Sarah Palin stupid (or in some cases, “stoopid”, ironically)

NATIONAL JOKER:
For their (increasingly lame) part, the increasingly conservative-disliking National Post searches and searches for the worst possible photo of Sarah Palin, who is universally accepted as very photogenic and attractive-looking.  And they finally settle on one.  I wonder who was in the room chuckling and yucking it up over this yummy choice.  And how old they were. 

And they further deflate their own reporting by including, in their “news story” (which was written by some unknown hack named Chris Boutet) a gratuitous link, in big font, to a ridiculous article entitled “Sarah Palin’s health care ‘death panels’ warning named ‘Lie of the Year”.  Just for your further reading and edification.  Chuckle!  Snicker!  It’s so fun to smear Sarah Palin!  Now let’s go over to Daily Kos! 

This all suggests to me that as a news organization, they simply can’t stand her; are prepared to demonstrate their abject disrespect for her; they can’t be objective about her despite the journalistic demands that they be so;  and are manifestly rather childish and unprofessional.  They apparently lack editorial leadership over there at that failing and practically bankrupt National Post paper.

 

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC"

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Friday, January 08, 2010

CBC.ca moderator actually removed a comment? WTF?

The state-owned CBC, which competes against Canadian citizen-owned news and entertainment and political advocacy media, and their blogs:  They allow swearing, they allow egregious personal insults and cheap shots, they allow their fans to call conservatives “Nazis” and make direct comparisons between anybody on the right and Hitler, they let their fans rip Christianity and Christians apart with vile, hateful rhetoric.  And as I’ve documented, they allow comments about Canadian soldiers on their news articles about the death of a Canadian soldier, like “THIS IS WHAT YOU DESERVE”, and others just like them in terms of taste and respect and intelligence.

So what on Earth did “SackLunch” write on the horrible web site of hate, the state-owned CBC.ca web site, on the story of yesterday’s funeral of the murdered Ottawa policeman that would warrant getting it removed? 

Well we didn’t have to look far.  While the genius CBC moderators took offense at what “SackLunch” wrote — enough to remove the comment — it took them long enough to do so that several other CBC commenters already had the time to read it and refer to what he wrote, and then repeat it in their own posts, quoting “SackLunch” and what he wrote directly.  The taxpayer-paid moderator failed to remove those references, so removing the offending comment was really a rather moot point. Yes, CBC, running a web site is hard work, and very costly.  I’m so, so sorry.

Apparently their fan wrote “who cares”.  Once again that’s “who cares”.  This, on the story of the funeral for an innocent murdered policeman.

I’m not sure what’s so OK with “THIS IS WHAT YOU DESERVE” on the occasion of a Canadian soldier dying, but “who cares” on the occasion of a policeman being killed is so offensive to the CBC.  But then who can figure out even the concept or rationale behind this whole state-owned, socialism-reliant media. 

Other delightful CBC commenters show their enormous respect by feigning concern over the cost of the funeral, even while blithely writing their comments on a taxpayer-paid web site which costs taxpayers well in excess of a BILLION dollars per year. 

rebuilt wrote:Posted 2010/01/07 at 1:12 PM ET

“...As a taxpayer who is probably picking up the tab, l I look forward to the end of these unnecessary expensive rituals.”

Referring to the thousands of officers who attended the funeral:

stuinvan wrote:Posted 2010/01/07 at 1:12 PM ET

“I trust we don’t pay these police to be off duty.”

The CBC.  A whole world of hate, derision, anger, divisiveness, and irrational far-left-wing emotions being displayed for all the world to see, on our dime.

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC"

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Rush Limbaugh heart attack: CBC’s leftist “tolerant” set wish him dead; CBC approves comments

UPDATED

CBC’s extremist liberal-left-wing “progressive” fans read the article about Rush Limbaugh’s heart attack and immediately began slobbering with their death wishes and naked exhibitions of vile hate, which they just HAD to express publicly for y’all. 

They do this at one of the only places that would allow such a thing: the God-awful CBC, which as I’ve documented time and again, is one of the most hateful, divisive, extremist, far-left web sites in North America.  The examples below are just the ones who apparently couldn’t wait to express their vile extremist left-wing hatred and mouth-watering savage joy at the news that Rush Limbaugh had a heart attack.  Imagine what some of them kept inside! 

And yes the CBC does moderate the comments, and yes they did approve of these that I pasted below, which I got not from one of those awful hate-sites that the left are always sending up to their various “human rights” divisions, but directly from that national taxpayer-paid, state-owned CBC web site which supposedly represents Canada to ourselves and the world.  There’s many more like them. and through the day, many more will be added by the CBC compassionates and tolerants.  CBC will keep approving them.  I think they like them. 

Wisdom wrote: Posted 2009/12/31at 8:06 AM ET

“Rush appreciates your prayers and well wishes…”

There will be none of the kind he asks for coming from me.

This one is another public school graduate who uses an apostrophe after Limbaugh to indicate the plural form of his name, while wishing him — hey, it’s us, actually! —all dead:

Raekwon91 wrote:Posted 2009/12/31 at 8:44 AM ET

Serves this loser right. We would all be better off if the world had less Russ Limbaugh’s.

Here’s some extra Christmas-y “compassion” that the liberal-left is always pretending they own:

appraiser wrote:Posted 2009/12/31 at 8:58 AM ET

He will be fine once they dislodge that twinkie stuffed with Vicodin from his superior vena cava.

This one simply HOPES for the death panels that they so ridiculed, in the case of Rush Limbaugh —and possibly select others.  Sort of like Adolph Hitler and the Nazis, no? Yes!  Exactly the same.  ...But our taxpayer-paid state-owned CBC approved it so it must be OK!

Fisherswife wrote:Posted 2009/12/31 at 9:34 AM ET

I wonder if the surgical implant is controled by an external force and that he, literally, is hearing voices in his head? I suppose he will expect the new national medical plan to cover the costs of this current hospitalization. I think they should unplug him.

This is another one that sounds an awful lot like Adolph Hitler and the Nazis… but the tolerant moderators at the CBC approved it!  Hitler lives!  He’s at the CBC!

PeterPumpkinhead wrote:Posted 2009/12/31 at 10:01 AM ET

The world would be a better place if Mr. Limbaugh faded into the night.

This one is just filled with rage and hate.  And you know it is, because like all liberals, they project their own abject hate onto those they hate the most.

True North wrote:Posted 2009/12/31 at 10:29 AM ET

Limbaugh is just reaping what he is sowing. He is an evil hate monger. The reich wingers like go-pher-it thrive on his brand of hate and then have the gall to accuse the left of being intolerant. Nice try, redneck, but it won’t wash.

Actually, you got it backward, Bucky.  It does wash, because you are a hate-filled, fascist, intolerant, left-wing ass!

This one doesn’t wish death on Rush Limbaugh per se —merely egregious physical harm and disability. I guess this is what the leftists and liberals mean by “compassion”. 

lowandtotheleft wrote:Posted 2009/12/31 at 11:01 AM ET

Ah Right Wingers, keep protecting your hate spewing idiot. I don’t wish death on him but I do wish that his illness causes him to permanently loose his voice.

Late addition:

“The Green Hornet” says on the CBC web site on the news that Limbaugh had a heart attack, that Rush Limbaugh is:
(a) “a terrorist worse than Osama bin Laden”
(b) a “fascist”
(c) “one scary individual who reminds me a great deal of Hitler”
(d) a “tub of lard”
(e) “He represents the weak minded and the fearfull.”  (That’s us!  Dumb and scared!  Nice!)
(f) he is “subhuman”
(g) and he calls us all “The Christian Taliban sheep who follow this shepherd of deceit.”  (So you see, my friends, we’re all savage terrorists now… because we like Rush Limbaugh.  But don’t worry, this is not bigotry, nor is it a radical extremist nutbar talkin’!)

But God bless him, he also adds:
(h) “For the record. I am a conservative. I believe in capatilisim, free market economies and democracy.” 
Oh yes.  I’m so sure.  Yes I’m so sure he’s a conservative.  And he’s ever so into all the “capatilisim”.  And possibly even capitalism.

The Green Hornet wrote:Posted 2009/12/31 at 2:31 PM ET

If this narcissistic, racist homophobe is considered to be “America’s most influential conservative voice”, then we have alot more to worry about than wingnuts like Sarah Palin.

He has done more to destroy America than Osama Bib Laden could ever do. He is a home grown terrorist with a licence to broadcast and is probably one of the reasons Obama decided NOT to repeal the Patriot Act. ...

[It goes on and on like this… and CBC approved it —Joel]

This is something you simply don’t see — at least not on this scale — from the conservative right.  And not on a state-owned, taxpayer-paid, supposedly mainstream web site.  Possibly on some underground hate site—I don’t know.  But not on a web site which pretends to be mainstream and normal.

It’s   weird   hilarious because we see all the left-wing and even far, extreme left-wing media —we all get access to all of it.  Like the CBC!  But like Fox News Channel and most everything that is tolerant of conservatives, I’ll bet a thousand dollars none of these intolerant leftist asses have ever actually been even remotely exposed to it.  They’ve never listened to an entire Rush Limbaugh radio show.  No radio station in Canada caries it, and it isn’t easily available online.  So how do they know to obediently hate him so? 

Hello CBC! 

At least they’re not in as much of a hurry as Wikipedia to see the opposition dead.  Wikipedia rushed to pronounce him dead within a short time after news broke, and adjusted his Wikipedia entry, before someone pointed out that in fact, he’s not dead.  Nice try, Wikipedia, but actually, I still don’t think this is what Barack Obama really meant by “hope”, or even “change”. 

And as a huge fan of Rush Limbaugh and a long-time subscriber to his superb web site, which comes complete with the ability to both listen to and watch his radio show live and in post-show recordings for a measly $6 per month, I wish him the very best health care that money can buy, and a full recovery.

UPDATE:
USA Today rushed to include a link to ProudToBeCanadian’s article about the egregious slobs at CBC.  (I always point this out because it’s only USA Today and New York Times and Boston Globe and others like them that present links to PTBC articles —it’s never any Canadian media). 

And of course this is a fantastic way to end the year —exposing the dreadful, state-owned CBC, with its rabidly leftist fans, to thousands of Americans —as the far-left, hate-filled site that it actually appears proud to be. 

But is it any wonder why one of our “ProudToBeCanadian” web site’s mottos is “It’s a question”?

EXTRA:
I checked cnews.canoe.ca and their “GOOD NEWS” section for the story of Rush Limbaugh’s health problems, but fortunately they decided it might be a little obvious or blithe or mirthful, this time around. 

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"ClimateGate"

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Monday, December 07, 2009

Dumb-ass left-wing global warming fundamentalists easily access Parliament. Got that, terrorists?

And here I thought the Islamofascist fundamentalists were the problem.  But it’s the extreme left-wing environmentalist fundies right here at home we should be worried about. “Home-grown” left-wing environmentalist extremists, as I’m sure the left-wing media like the CBC will call them, as they call the “so-called” terrorists when they’re living in Toronto via Yemen and through Saudi Arabia.

Over on the CBC’s web site, we have their usual Useful Idiots Brigade of extreme left-wing fundamentalists rushing to champion the freaks who breached our national security.  And in accordance with their global socialist governance view, are actually defending the Greenpeace hippies who gained full access to the seat of our government and democracy, with all that this entails about the state of our national security.  They’re totally cool with this.  For example this useful idiot, who sounds every bit like a communist to me, as do so many of the Canadians who have been raised under the socialism-reliant and socialism-promoting CBC’s tutelage.

Break into our Parliament Buildings and prove to terrorists the world over that we’re national security pushovers?  No problem.  It’s only when an honesty-seeking whistleblower “breaks into” a nefarious computer database and reveals what appears to be the biggest left-wing/government/media fraud in recent world history —
CBC covers it over the banner “The Climate Question”, as if this security breach is about “climate change”, and calls the criminals “HILL CRASHERS”, and the story is simply brushed-off as “Parliament Hill Protests”, rather than “a monumental national security breach” which “exposes our security weakness to all the world” and what more serious countries might “take seriously”.  Moreover, the RCMP officer couldn’t get that offensive smirk off her face as she was questioned about their lapse of our national security.the “man-made global warming”, uh, “science” — that the extreme leftists’ collective heads explode and they become angry warriors (angry at the whistleblowers, of course!), and demand police charges and the firing squad. 

Actually, I don’t doubt that just as they did after 9/11, many of the left would forgive Islamofascist terrorists if they, instead, had done what the Greenpeace left-wing extremists had done today. So it’s confusing that way.  (But attempt to put up a Christmas tree at Parliament Hill?  And call it a Christmas tree instead of “a happy-tree of seasonal values”... that’s a declaration of war, baby!)

But it’s a learning moment. 
1.  Now we know, and al Qaeda knows, and all terrorists and other like-minded know, the very seat of our democracy and government is easily penetrable by dumb-ass left-wing hippies, so leave the complicated break-in plans at home in Yemen or in Moscow or Chonqing, and simply look for an unattended scaffold or bring your own ladder, hopefully purchased at a non-profit hardware co-op.

2.  Memo to the Canadians:  The first priority of a national government has to be its nation’s security, the very most basic element of which has once again proven to be way beyond their “pay grade”, at least without the help of the Americans, upon whom we totally rely for our national security.  But note that this is the same government, the left-wing minions of which want to look after your children in national “daycare” (and “early learning” —wink!) centers;  and think they are best equipped to look after you and your family’s health care;  and of course tend to your law and order and personal safety and national security needs. 

3.  Obviously we can’t rely on the government’s national police force.  Maybe the government and y’all should call Alarm Force at 1-800-267-2001.  And possibly take a gun safety course and get your license, and a gun.

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC"

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Thursday, October 29, 2009

CBC’s extreme leftist readers already licking chops over death of Nat’l Post (it’s not state owned!)

They’re all in a state of perfunctory delight, even before the death sentence is announced, and may not be in the end.  But one CBC web site reader, “vangrungy”, said it right, in this rare lucid thought amongst the plethora of left-wing CBC commenting hysteria:  “Flocking lefties are descending on a safe thread…”.  Three other readers wrote sane things too.  Leftists like nothing more than to be part of the goose-stepping flock, where they can say things with the assurance that most everybody in the room agrees with them. 

They all miss the dark, sad irony that they’re ever so safely writing their cowardly, left-wing drivel on a state-owned, taxpayer-funded left-wing media tool that competes against the privately-owned and now facing bankruptcy National Post.  Using the state tool which is competing for readers, commenters, buyers, and advertisers. Or they blithely ignore that fact on purpose.  Perfunctory, as I said.  And it stinks to high heaven.

Many of the CBC readers appear to me to be book-burners of the extreme, sometimes apparently Marxist and fascist hard left.  They seem to think the National Post—or any other conservative tolerant media — should not exist.  And by the way, conservative tolerant is as far “right” as it went at the NatPo, and I’ve derided them here, constantly, for their liberal stances on many things, not the least of which was their insufferable love affair for their man, Barack Obama (and their baseless derision of Ann Coulter).  But the leftist cabal at the CBC honestly seem to think that any newspaper or media that isn’t state-owned and promoting socialism is ipso facto “right-wing”, or “conservative” or “Harper’s mouthpiece”, or other examples of their shear idiocy and lack of intellect and political sophistication.  Media that doesn’t precisely fit their mold — that is media that isn’t overtly socialist, Marxist, or at least far left-wing should, it seems, be banned, or at least they desperately wish for their demise. 

And suddenly, now with this news, all that cheap talk about those jobs that they usually and oh, ever so earnestly and loudly lament being lost (particularly all those union jobs which are so much a part of their “working family” claptrap) don’t matter.  Suddenly freedom of speech doesn’t matter.  Suddenly inclusiveness and diversity doesn’t matter.  Suddenly democracy doesn’t matter.  And suddenly, any talk of “bailouts” and other government financial supports, à la the state-owned, taxpayer-funded CBC media, is utterly shunned and mocked, in this one particular case.

Also note, as I paste a few examples below, that correct spelling and grammar and punctuation and even lucid writing skills actually do still matter in this world, and I find the vast majority of CBC readers are bereft of those skills. Apparently, not only are these goose-steppers hooked by the state-owned left-wing brain-numbing media, they are products of the state-owned, public schools as well.

Eliezer wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 6:28 PM ET
Corporate “News” papers, including the “National Post,” are out-of-touch with the Canadian public. Too much Corporate propaganda, editorializing & selective editing under the guise & pretense of reporting the “news.”  ...

PaulRStJohn’s wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 6:17 PM ET
It will be a good day when I see the last issue of that corporatist rag. All it ever was was a rah-rah for the wealthy and powerful.

AlexTrebaked wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 5:43 PM ET
Just one less Zionist extremist rag.  CanWest is owned by the Asper family, admittedly pro-Israel and so, by definition, Zionist in terms of its political perspective.  ... 

**mgcatfish wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 4:15 PM ET
It’s about time this stupid fascist rag went under. Here’s hoping nobody saves it.

MarEng67 wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 2:27 PM ET
Most people don’t buy it since most people don’t favour right wing politics.
Let it die.
Best for everyone.
And for Canada.

lowandtotheleft wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 3:42 PM ET
GOOD another dirty right wing propaganda paper gone and I agree let’s get rid of the SUN while we are at it…

**Apparently “mgcatfish” has a brain about the size of a cat fish, since the only historic examples of “fascism” in modern times were Hitler and Mussolini, both ardent socialists; and that of several contemporary liberals and socialists in America and Canada.  (And writing that in a taxpayer-funded, state-owned media web site is of course, at best, ironic.)

And here’s one that makes you go “huh?”

keithkcummings wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 3:42 PM ET
good riddence to old trash. Nice to see Canadians shutting down such a huge right-wing American propaganda machine.

And of course the CBC has way more than its fair share of the truly stupid and utterly incomprehensible nutbars who don’t know right from left and there from their (or are from our...): 

void1962 wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 5:44 PM ET
Death to the jobs of these 6 figure hacks , who shovel this world economy drivel down are throats by way of there right wing agenda
Go get a real job
Good Bye

And there are the stupid who completely miss the irony of their utter stupidity and ignorance:

hbtharle wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 5:12 PM ET
We don’t need any paper that cannot pay its own way, do we? Funny how conservatives are always talking about letting market forces decide but are the first to look for protection when they are in trouble. I hope the government lets the market decide.

“Let the market decide”?  Oh really?  Are you sure, CBC viewer (and one of the very few)?  Do I really need to post another Top-20 ratings chart showing that the CBC is an abysmal failure at attracting the interest of Canadians despite countless tens of BILLIONS in taxpayer subsidies?  No.  No I don’t.

And here’s one that literally makes you want to yell, “Right back atcha, CBC supporter!”

man4change wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29at 3:36 PM ET
It’s not surprising the National Post has lost so much revenue. This paper is nothing more than a conservative propaganda flyer. Why don’t the Tories finance the National Post with their own party funds?

More things that make you go “huh?”  And/or more of that “if it ain’t socialist state-owned media, it’s therefore ‘right wing’”:

alchemy wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 3:33 PM ET
...Can you name one newspaper or news outlet that is not right wing in this country?
Thank god for the CBC and Toronto Star….

(And to answer his idiotic question:  Yes.  Yes I can name perhaps one.  Or maybe three dozen.  Maybe he’s trying to be sarcastic?)

“PeterPumkinhead” is actually a dunderhead.  Here he displays his abject lack of perspective, his abject distaste for different perspectives, his abject hate for freedom of speech and diversity of opinion, and oh, so much more:

PeterPumpkinhead wrote:
Posted 2009/10/29 at 3:30 PM ET
Leonard Asper made this paper the Con rag that it is. His dad (Izzy) would have been rolling in his grave at how far right Lenny has taken his business.
Shame on you Leonard for the destruction of Canwest and shame on you for the damage you’ve done to this country by waging your war against the free press and against Canadian centre-left values.

Personally, I do hope for the demise of the CBC, and not just because they’re overtly left-wing and anti-conservative.  (You will notice I’ve never demanded they simply hire conservatives).  It’s because as I think I’ve said before, state-owned and state-run media should be banned in this and every country, and that notion should be enshrined in our constitution. 

And as I constantly question, what kind of government competes against its own citizens in business for profits, and in the arena of ideas and politics?  And did the National Post need this competition from the state?  I really doubt it. But the CBC has helped breed readers who do think so. On your dime.

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Friday, August 21, 2009

This is what you deserve, Canada.  A CBC like this.

PTBC reader Daniel sends this along this morning, reminding us to visit the national taxpayer-paid, state-owned web site of hate and division, the CBC web site, today.

The CBC site is where the taxpayer-paid moderators pre-read CBC fan/reader comments, then approve of the ones they find suitable for a state-owned, national taxpayer-paid news media web site of unity and understanding.  To help bring Canadians together and do whatever possible to elevate the discussion, go beyond name-calling and cheap insults and crass left-wing-promoting and rabidly anti-conservative politics, if only because all taxpayers are paying for it.  And because it’s a national news media web site paid for by all taxpayers rather than a crass politics blog run by an individual, it ostensibly represents our nation to the world.  And because the site is itself promoted as a learning tool for children across the nation, for use even within classrooms. 

Unfortunately, like virtually all “progressive” government programs, this one is of course an abject failure of mammoth proportions on every level.  Worse, in fact.  The site is actually one of the most hateful and divisive web sites in all of North America, as I see it. 

That CBC fan/commenter comment is tame compared to others there, even if it blatantly calls non-liberals fascists just like Hitler, by ever so cutely calling them the “Reich Wing”; and calling the Conservatives the “CRAP” Party;  and calling our Prime Minister “Slime Minister Harper”;  and generally casting non-liberals as sycophantic nutbars and idiots.  Time for recess, kids! 

One rarely sees such abject and hateful bigotry in any web site, least of all at a national, taxpayer-paid, state-owned news media web site where comments are pre-read and approved by moderators, anywhere in the world. 

As Daniel wrote:

... Now, I’ve seen many slurs, but here we go again - anyone not supporting the great Liberal agenda MUST be a Nazi!  Shame on us conservatives, we’re too busy worshiping Hitler to have a proper understanding of how things work in this country. Other comments mirrored this poster’s way of thinking.  Isn’t it funny how when a liberal attacks a conservative with names and thinly veiled references to Nazism, it’s okay, yet when a conservative outs a liberal on their own hypocrisy, it’s terrible and we’re the scum of the earth?

Are liberals really that out of touch with society?

Yes.

The CBC site is also where, when the CBC published a story of the death of a Canadian soldier fighting for our country in Afghanistan, they approved a comment from one of their fans, who wrote “THIS IS WHAT YOU DESERVE” (referring of course to the dead soldier, and possibly his family).  They approved and continue to approve others just like that.  Naturally his family would no doubt be reading the story at the CBC, and all the CBC comments about the story, in their search for comfort from anywhere they could find it, including possibly at their national state-owned taxpayer-paid media, upon their heroic son’s death, after fighting and dying for our country. But the CBC doesn’t care. 

The CBC is a national disgrace.

State-owned and state-run media should be banned in this country, and that notion enshrined in a constitution. 

EXTRA NITPICK:

The CBC fan/commenter was clearly educated in the government-run schools (as was the moderator), where they don’t teach the proper placement of apostrophes when denigrating conservatives or anyone else who isn’t left-wing.  It’s Liberals’, not Liberal’s. 

And the writer should know, but doesn’t, possibly because he was taught lies by socialists and propagandists, that Nazis and Hitler were tyrannical, atheist socialists.  Big totalitarian government left-wingers who hated Jews.  Really quite the opposite of what we know as Canada’s “right-wing” or conservatives generally. 

And why on earth would conservatives’ fingers be “gnarly”?  Do conservatives have “gnarly” fingers?  Why the phony allusion to grotesque physical attributes?  I mean besides the possibility that the writer is a bigoted fascist-like idiot. 

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

CBC commenter seems to compare Harper and Conservatives to Hitler/Nazis:  CBC moderator approves it

The CBC, as I’ve said before, is one of the most hateful and divisive web sites in all of North America—at least insofar as mainstream non-Nazi and non-al-Qaeda-type web sites.  It’s constantly filled with anti-Christian rhetoric and hate-speech of all sorts from its fanatic commenters who rush to spread their hate in comments to CBC “news” stories, mostly of the hate everything remotely conservative variety.  This, I imagine, is the CBC’s idea of bringing Canadians together and uniting us all, in ways that only the U.S.-based Daily Kos could (and they’re privately-owned, so that won’t do ... although they use their writers).

Today, one CBC commenter seemed to clearly compare Prime Minister Harper and the Conservatives to Hitler and the Nazis.  It was approved by the CBC moderator. 

LostProgressive wrote: “...Simply accept that straight white evangelical anglophone men from Alberta are the master race and we only deserve what they give us…”

There is almost no other context in which we speak of “the master race” other than in the context of Hitler and Nazis, so the comparison is rather clear and direct, as I — a sober Canadian who isn’t high on pot — see it.  The abject bigotry and unhinged hateful rhetoric of the CBC commenter is only further disgraced by his reference to what he (clearly negatively) dubs as the “evangelical” Prime Minister, betraying a bit of hate and bile toward Christians too.  And for his trouble, the other CBC fans gave it a whole mitt-full of “thumbs up”.  But the typical CBC fans’ anti-Christian bile doesn’t stop here.  (See below.)

It’s a very carefully-chosen story by the socialism-reliant, left-wing, politically-correct-obsessed CBC story regarding the decision by the government of Prime Minister Harper to not fund, with your taxpayer dollars, yet another “gay pride” parade in Montreal (this one isn’t even the “official” gay pride parade — that one takes place in two weeks — this is yet another one —in yet another Canadian city —well, Montreal, in The Nation Of Quebec). 

It doesn’t bother to report the “news” of any other of the many dozens or perhaps hundreds of applications for funding that were turned down by the government.  Just this one.  Why do you suppose that would be?  Are they trying to drive a wedge again?  Trying to divide Canadians again?  Trying to drum up the totally predictable hate speech against Harper and Conservatives and small-c conservatives and Christians…. again?  Here’s a hint:  Yes.  Yes they are.  It’s because this is a GAY THING.  That is the only reason they brought it up.  Because it’s GAY.  And the agenda-driving CBC is using one of their favorite special interest groups, once again, to try to bully the government into funding one of their premier left-wing causes (besides themselves), and to help rally the troops against conservatives and Conservatives.

One of the extremely rare islands of sanity on that CBC.ca hate site, a person named RoryTarant wrote:  “This article fails to mention the other thousands of organizations that didn’t receive funding either…really CBC…you should be trying to unite the country not divide it. Don’t highlight one organization and make it out to be a big political debate.”

As if on cue —no hang on a second, let me start that again.  Exactly on cue, the sheeple and useful idiots at the CBC—the CBC fans—naturally rushed to work their magic at the CBC.ca hate site of divisiveness, first with the anti-Christian hate speech.  (Spelling and punctuation are not skills well-learned by any CBC fans, who were clearly educated in public state-owned, state-run schools —I mean besides the CBC school.  I didn’t mis-type any of this):

•  cookiecrumble wrote: “...I would’nt expect anything else from steve and his born again hypocrites...”.  I gather from this that “born again” is something Christian, and bad.  This one hates Christians, and wants to spread that hate publicly on the hate-filled state-owned media web site.  And by golly I must be a genius because the CBC moderator missed that.  APPROVED by the CBC.  (And ever notice how the brilliant Harper haters all call the Prime Minister of Canada something as irreverent as possible to them, like “steve”, or “stevie”, or “Harpo”, or “Christian”?)

•  Somebody by the name “david ben mark” (yes of course, no capital letters) wrote, in part, ”...This decision is clearly biased and stinks of his right wing religious fundamentalist leanings and the homophobic nonsense generated by those beliefs...”.  I’m so sorry, but is this the state-funded anti-Christian HATE SITE?  Why yes it is.  APPROVED by the CBC.

•  LiamSmyth wrote that the Harper Conservatives are “fundamentalists”, which I take as barely disguised anti-Christian hate speech.  APPROVED by the CBC.

•  Thanatos wrote: “First thing you have to realize, is Harpo and his band of religious fanatics, hate gay people. Second, they hate the French Canadians.”  This I take to be a multiple case of pure bigotry, hypocrisy, hate, and psychological projection.  A rather amazing phenomenon unique to the CBC.ca hate site and its fans.  APPROVED by the CBC.

•  v0ci3cau3a wrote: “Welcome to the theocracy folks.”  I again take this to be barely disguised anti-Christian hate speech, as well as pure BS and particularly mindless left-wing rhetoric.  APPROVED by the CBC.

•  santa_maria wrote:  “Ah, the conservative religionists come home to roost on their unadmitted policy, at last…”.  See above.

•  justinmathieu wrote: ”...I cant imagine anything worse for ultra right wing religious nut jobs from out West then tax dollars going to a French gay event….”.  Wow.  “ultra right wing”, huh?  Possibly to an ultra left-wing Marxist useful idiot and CBC fan.  And then of course the anti-Christian HATE SPEECH in the form of “religious nut jobs”.  Nice!  Unifying!  Tolerant!  APPROVED by the CBC.

•  Montag451 wrote: ”...Remerber the CPC is heavily backed by the Utah Mormons & the US Chiristian Right who want the Tories to destroy gay marriage and equal protection of gays under the law.”  Oh dear.  The “Utah Mormons”, no less.  “Destroy”.  “Heavily”. 

•  kipwilson wrote:  ”...The Harper Conservatives are mostly western separatist evangelical extremists. They are anti-gay and anti-Francophone....”.  Well shit they’re everything bad, then, huh? 

The anti-Christian bile goes on and on, on the state-owned CBC.ca hate site.  There’s tons of “homophobia” pronouncements as well, in which the left-wing “tolerant” set seeks to explain to us that all conservatives and all people who don’t perfectly appease the gays and their lifestyles and their wants and wishes and their funding “requests” and gay marriage and who don’t go to gay pride parades are, alas, “homophobes”. 

•  Simon Shaw called the Harper Conservatives “a group of highly homophobic individuals”.  A “group of”, huh?  That’d be bigotry, pure bigotry.  Nice work missing that, CBC!  And note that it’s not simply “homophobic”, it’s “highly homophobic”.  See, the standard level of “homophobia” is so overplayed now, so they have to up it to “highly homophobic”.  Soon it will be “extreme” homophobia to miss a gay pride parade and not happily donate your hard-warned cash for their lewd sexual displays on our city streets. 

•  Don James Anderson called the Harper Conservatives ”vindictive homophobes”, and furthermore, “These redneck, Republican-wanna-be, hayseeds have got to go!”.  OOPS.  I forgot the possibility of “vindictive homophobes”! 

•  suth_2468 wrote: ”...I can’t wait for the day when Harper is gone and this biggots and homophobes will stop being validated.”  Irony!  Too bad the writer doesn’t know it.

•  EspoZito wrote:  “The homophobes and rednecks are working hard today!”.  This is a judgment only on the work habits of some particular folks.  So don’t worry. 

•  One guy is an overt racist, and an overt sexist, but CBC liked his comment anyway:  joeyjojo wrote: ”...I look forward to the day when a woman or ethnic person runs for PM.”  APPROVED by the CBC.  The fans loved it, giving it 490+ “thumbs up”.  It’s as if they all watch the CBC all day long, and therefore have learned to hate white males. 

Then it’s back to plain old CBC-style hate speech against Prime Minister Harper and conservatives, which is de rigueur for leftists at the CBC:

•  Kimberleytg wrote: ”...To shun these events can only be seen as blatant discrimination. ...So, to those who support this blatantly dsicriminatory action, please put bandaids on your bleeding knuckles...”, thereby comparing conservatives to Neanderthals or apes, which is what the truly mindless left-wing folk do. 

And of course the usual useful idiot’s pitch for socialism:

•  LPinMtl wrote (sounding like a socialist and a truly progressive new age sycophant and the perfect CBC fan): ”...it’s the government’s job to fund cultural events that promote Canadian culture…”

 

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Monday, July 06, 2009

CBC reports on historic find of earliest Bible.  CBC fans respond with pure hate. CBC approves.

It’s the news of the historic find of a historic work — what is believed to be the earliest Bible and possibly the earliest book of any kind ever found. 

The moment I saw the story on CBC’s state/taxpayer-funded web site of hate and national division, I knew it would bring out the CBC’s nurtured readers and fans, and their abject full-on hate and absolute intolerance for anything Christian. 

The first piece of CBC-approved hate speech I saw has gotten 72 “thumbs up” from the other CBC fans.

Here’s just some of the hate and intolerance appearing right now on your taxpayer-funded CBC web site of peace, love, and Canadian unity and understanding.  Please note that these comments are all APPROVED by the taxpayer-paid CBC moderators. 

meow face wrote:
Posted 2009/07/06 at 2:29 PM ET

Looking forward to noting all the changes and contradictions that will surface in this ‘god-inspired’ piece of crap.

———————————————

zeelaw wrote:
Posted 2009/07/06 at 2:43 PM ET

sweet, Ignorance has gone viral once again.

———————————————

DavidWpg wrote:
Posted 2009/07/06 at 2:43 PM ET

So how much is one willing to pay for this work of FICTION that has cost the world hundreds of millions of lives?

———————————————

All Monetary systems are flawed wrote:
Posted 2009/07/06 at 2:53 PM ET

What a waste of time. If I want to hear a good story I’ll ask my grandpa.

———————————————

wessex wrote:
Posted 2009/07/06 at 5:09 PM ET

[...] That really is the primary goal of the Bible: social control for the benefit of tribal chieftains – and nothing more, I’m sure.

...It is hard to believe how so many millions, especially its victims, are so gulled by this silly book.

———————————————

mr. e pantsuit wrote:
Posted 2009/07/06 at 5:39 PM ET

neat. but still boring. i would still nod off at the part about that guy who was really mad about this other guy doing some coveting or some false idolling or something or other. and then he called in the grasshoppers and the bats, i think, or the pus ? either way, he was ticked. and i haven’t caught the end, but i’m pretty sure it ends badly for a lot of folks. especially this one guy.

———————————————

---

This page is showing specific category results only:
"CBC.ca Reader Comments"

Thursday, June 11, 2009

UPDATED: CBC commenter on historic church fire: “hopefully they’ll ... build something of value…”

On the story of what the Canadian state-owned media, the taxpayer-funded CBC, is reporting on air as a fire destroying a 120-year-old church being investigated by Gatineau, Quebec police as a criminal act (without further explanation, because who cares, I guess!  It’s not like it’s a Muslim mosque!), one of the CBC.ca’s huge crowd of hate-filled fans wrote: 

“Hopefully they’ll take this opportunity to build a library or school… Something of value for the whole community - and society in general.”

—reader comment by CBC fan “memoryhole”,
posted 2009/06/11 at 11:25 AM ET

Because churches have no value, apparently, according to the CBC fan. 

Is this what the CBC has bought us for our billions in taxpayer cash?  Anti-Christian near-hatred and what is certainly a display of abject anti-Christian-speak and gross intolerance, like this?  Openly expressed on taxpayer-funded web sites?  Fantastic. 

More of the state-owned taxpayer-funded CBC helping to bring Canadians together again.  Thanks CBC. 

Also see “THIS IS WHAT YOU DESERVE” (CBC reader comment on story of Canadian soldier dying for our country in Afghanistan).

EXTRA SUPPORTIVE OF THE CBC:
Here’s the commercial advertisement appearing (twice) on the same CBC.ca page where the above anti-Christian comment appears —it’s for “Directbuy, Inc”:

I’ve added it to my list of PushBack companies that support socialism-reliant government agencies like the CBC, which compete against citizens and work against the free-market and capitalism and freedom, and which we should therefore not support if at all possible. 

UPDATE:
Upon confirmation from police that the fire was in fact arson, some of the CBC’s anti-Christian haters jump into action with comments like these, and more:

——————————————————————————-
Stueysplace wrote:
Posted 2009/06/11 at 5:49 PM ET

Glad to see it go. I am sick of the church telling us how to live. Those who torched it will, no doubt, be incarcerated when they should, in fact, receive the Order Of Canada.

——————————————————————————-
[Not so much “hateful” as “blithely ignorant” and “arrogantly dismissive” —Joel]
freemarketrules wrote:
Posted 2009/06/11 at 4:50 PM ET

Good article CBC

But I don’t really care. It doesn’t affect me.

——————————————————————————-

• Home
• J-Log
• Columnists
• PTBC Amazon Store
• PTBC Stuff
• About
• Contact
• Cashier