ProudToBeCanadian
It's a question.
The latest from our COLUMNIST SECTION:
-
03/14 at 09:36 AM
David Warren
Many ways to see the world -
03/14 at 09:31 AM
Doug Giles
Hey Obama, Keep Your Hands Off My Fishing Pole -
03/13 at 10:22 AM
Salim Mansur
Iraq stumbles toward democracy -
03/13 at 10:12 AMDavid Warren
Icesave -
03/12 at 08:43 AM
Susan Martinuk
Say you’re sorry—and then fix the system -
03/11 at 07:23 AM
Ann Coulter
What’s Arabic For ‘You’re No Atticus Finch’? -
03/10 at 09:06 AM
Barbara Kay
Dropping the r-bomb -
03/09 at 09:01 PM
Mike S. Adams
The Breyer Patch -
03/08 at 09:01 PMMike S. Adams
The University of Notre Shame -
03/07 at 07:04 PMDavid Warren
Tyranny of but -
03/07 at 07:18 AMDoug Giles
Should Christians Use Saul Alinsky’s Tactics in Exposing Corruption? -
03/06 at 09:03 AMSalim Mansur
Protect free speech, even if offensive -
03/06 at 07:45 AM
Rory Leishman
A rare display of political courage -
03/06 at 07:41 AMDavid Warren
The pampered, privileged public service -
03/05 at 09:21 AM
S. Wray Gregoire
Are We the World?
NOTE: PTBC is once again welcoming reader comments in both the "J-Log" blog section, and in the Columnist section, at least for a while. Logging in makes it easier to comment. Please participate! Thanks.
PTBC Columnist Team
Columnists -- with bite! We feature conservative-friendly writers from Canada and the U.S. who help clarify the difference between liberals and conservatives. All have personally agreed to be a part of our team here at PTBC.
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
Theo Caldwell
posted on Wednesday, February 03, 2010
Bio | Theo Caldwell Archives | Printer-Friendly Version
Read Comments/Make Comments (There's 0 so far)
Sunday’s Super Bowl is not just a contest between two football teams. This year, there is an undercard, featuring a clash of beliefs about life and choice.
Tim Tebow, the Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback for the University of Florida, is set to appear in a pro-life commercial during the game, along with his mother, Pam. The ad tells the story of Pam’s difficult pregnancy, in which she contracted an infection and was advised to abort Tim. Pro-choice activists claim that the ad, paid for by the Christian group Focus on the Family, could lead to violence and have been pressuring CBS to keep it off the air. The broadcaster has said the commercial will be shown, but the imbroglio begs the question: Can the abortion fight ever be resolved?
In Canada and the United States, folks are fond of saying the issue of abortion is “settled,” pointing to rulings by each country’s Supreme Court, in 1988 and 1973, respectively. But the decades of turbulence over this matter have taught us that something so emotional and elemental is not “settled” by a few lawyers.
Other news from recent days proves the point. In Kansas, the trial of the man accused of killing late-term abortion provider George Tiller began on January 22, the 37th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade ruling (Scott Roeder was convicted of Tiller’s murder one week later). At the same time, a new Marist poll shows a majority of Americans, and nearly 6 in 10 young adults, see abortion as morally wrong.
Meanwhile in this country, a recent Angus Reid poll finds, “Only one-in-five Canadians (20%) are aware of the current status-quo of abortion in Canada: a woman can have an abortion at any time during her pregnancy, with no restrictions whatsoever.” In addition, “Respondents are almost evenly divided on whether the health care system should fund abortions whenever they are requested.”
To be sure, whenever the topic of abortion is broached, people become angry almost at once. But before everyone gets their sticks up (to expand the sporting analogy), let’s suppose for a moment that there is, in fact, common ground on this issue. One finding of the Reid poll gives us a starting point:
“A large majority of Canadians (79%) would back an initiative in their own province that would make it mandatory for health care workers to offer information to pregnant women about alternatives to abortion.”
It is often said that it is more effective to change hearts than to change legislation. In this case, while the finding speaks of a “mandatory” initiative, the underlying sentiment may, in fact, be most helpful. To wit, while abortion may never again be illegal, it is broadly undesirable.
Common parlance bears this out. Politicians who believe abortion should be available any time, for any reason, rarely speak in plain terms. They talk of “choice” and “reproductive freedom” and “women’s rights.” Indeed, it would take a hard person to say that abortion, as an act, is a good thing. If we can agree on that, it means most of our hearts are in the same place.
So, what if we agreed that, as long as public money subsidizes abortion, an equal or greater amount should go toward a mechanism to find homes for unwanted babies? If you really wanted to be controversial, you could add a bit about preventing unplanned pregnancies in the first place – that is, letting young people know that abstinence isn’t only about Bible-thumping and promise bracelets – but that might be too big a leap right away. For now, let’s just suppose that citizens made it a priority that every little person gets a chance at life and no young woman goes through the misery of abortion.
This is less a function of writing laws than of changing priorities. Nothing gets banned in this scenario, but possibilities are opened. If we shift our default response to an unwanted pregnancy from contemplating abortion to offering support, great things could happen.
Add incentives for religious and private-sector organizations to provide money and means for young mothers who want to raise their babies themselves, and we’re starting to get somewhere. Again, if we stipulate that abortion itself is a tragic act, wouldn’t a robust and ubiquitous network of alternatives be helpful? When you offer people good choices, bad laws become irrelevant.
The hardship of anyone contemplating an abortion is something that cannot be denied. Pam Tebow knew this fear all too well. And the perspective from which the decision is undertaken makes all the difference.
Ironically, one of the world’s foremost experts on death, the late Dr. Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, provides a quotation applicable to this fundamental question of life: “Mankind’s greatest gift, also its greatest curse, is that we have free choice. We can make our choices built from love or from fear.”
Folks can always choose, but with love and support, it becomes easier to choose wisely. What a wonderful thing that would be for women and families. And, not for nothing, millions of little people would get a chance at life, with all the choices it has to offer.
...............................
Theo Caldwell, president of Caldwell Asset Management, Inc., is an investment advisor in the United States and Canada. His columns regularly appear in the National Post and Sun Media papers. You can visit his web site at TheoCaldwell.com.
Buy his new book Finn the half-Great—A great kids’ book!
Posted on 02/03/10 at 07:40 PM
• Please vote with your dollars to help ensure the continued availability of this site.
• If you think this site is of no value, then don't pay anything for it, and it will fade into the sunset. That's capitalism at work.
• 
Spread the word! Email this to a friend |
• Printer-Friendly |
• Permalink
• Category: Theo Caldwell +
COMMENTS
Comments do not necessarily reflect or in any way represent the opinion of the main blog entry writer or owner of this site, and claims to the contrary are spurious. Distasteful, abusive, hateful, or annoying remarks will likely be deleted; but since this is a relatively open forum, bad comments may accidentally remain on this site. The fact that a comment remains does not indicate an endorsement of the views.
There are no comments for this entry yet. Please make one even if it's just to say you agree!
