The latest from our COLUMNIST SECTION:
-
Tuesday, Feb 01, 10:35 AM
Mike S. Adams
Left State University -
Sunday, Jan 30, 12:41 PM
Doug Giles
Hey, Chris Matthews: I Like Big Guns and I Cannot Lie -
Saturday, Jan 29, 09:16 AM
Michael Coren
Defender to defendant -
Saturday, Jan 29, 08:46 AM
Salim Mansur
U.S. can’t afford to ignore world in crisis -
Sunday, Jan 23, 07:37 AM
Doug Giles
Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God -
Saturday, Jan 22, 08:32 AM
Mike S. Adams
Kermit the Dog -
Saturday, Jan 22, 08:24 AM
Michael Coren
Grief or glamour? -
Saturday, Jan 22, 08:11 AM
Salim Mansur
Tunisia just one Arab regime going stale -
Friday, Jan 21, 12:00 PM
Theo Caldwell
The TSA Tea Party -
Saturday, Jan 15, 07:48 AM
Michael Coren
Forget blame game -
Saturday, Jan 15, 07:38 AM
Salim Mansur
Beware of China’s meteoric rise -
Tuesday, Jan 11, 09:12 AM
Mike S. Adams
Welcome to Personal Responsibility 101 -
Monday, Jan 10, 08:12 AM
Doug Giles
Snookie’s Smut or Cowboy Values? -
Saturday, Jan 08, 09:44 AM
Michael Coren
Tube for lefty boobs -
Saturday, Jan 08, 09:42 AM
Salim Mansur
Bloody start to New Year -
Wednesday, Jan 05, 04:42 PM
Ann Coulter
Investigate This! -
Tuesday, Jan 04, 07:20 AM
Mike S. Adams
Does Fort Worth Ever Cross Your Mind? -
Monday, Jan 03, 11:54 AM
Steven Milloy
EPA’s Mercurial Hypocrisy -
Sunday, Jan 02, 09:45 AM
Doug Giles
2011 Resolution: Annoy the Left 365 -
Sunday, Jan 02, 09:35 AM
David Warren
Robin Hoodism is on the rise
Click here to see more of our columns or use the drop-down menu atop this stack)
.jpg)
Free-Market Capitalist Consumer Information:
These companies choose to advertise on the
socialism-reliant CBC:
(Links lead to mailing addresses)
• AIG (insur)
• Air Canada
• AOL Travel
• Bank of Montreal ("BMO")
• Best Western
• Canada Protection Plan
• Canada Revenue Agency (!)
• Canadian Tire Fin Serv
• Chip Home Income Plan
• CIBC
• Cold FX
• Desjardins (insurance)
• Directbuy, Inc
• Edward Jones
• General Motors
• Grand and Toy
• Grey Power (insurance)
• H&R Block
• Hilton Hotels
• iContact email marketing
• Infinity (cars)
• Koodoo mobile
• Lens Crafters
• Monster.ca
• National Post
• Neutrogena
• Nutrisystem
• Quicktax
• RBC (Royal bank)
• Rogers Cable
• ScotiaBank
• Shaw Cable
• Texas Travel
• The Co-operators (ins)
• Tim Hortons
• Travelodge
• Vonage
• WeightWatchers
• Westjet
• Working.com
• Zip.ca
Please read more here.
PTBC Columnist Team
Columnists -- with bite! We feature conservative-friendly writers from Canada and the U.S. who help clarify the difference between liberals and conservatives. All have personally agreed to be a part of our team here at PTBC.
Rory Leishman
Posted on Saturday, September 06, 2008
Bio/Email | Rory Leishman Archives | Printer-Friendly Version
Just as most liberals fancy themselves as more idealistic and compassionate than conservatives, so most Canadians fondly suppose that Canada is morally superior to the United States. Yet as recent political events on both sides of the border confirm, neither assumption is true.
Consider, first, the fate of Bill C-484, the Unborn Victims of Crime Act. This private-members’ bill introduced by Conservative MP Ken Epp would make it a criminal offence for a person to kill a child before birth during a criminal attack on the mother. Such laws are commonplace in the United States, but under existing Canadian law, a person who deliberately kills a child in the womb by kicking, punching, stabbing or shooting the mother can only be charged with murdering or assaulting the mother.
Epp’s Bill specifically states that his Unborn Victims of Crime Act would not apply to “conduct relating to the lawful termination of the pregnancy of the mother of the child to which the mother has consented.” Nonetheless, most liberals and socialists have joined with the so-called Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada in opposing the bill. In the words of New Democrat MP Alexa McDonough, these critics fear that the legislation “could become a thin edge of the wedge in the direction of recriminalizing abortion.”
To make matters worse, Conservative Justice Minister Rob Nicholson has acceded to these concerns. Last week, he proceeded, in effect, to kill Epp’s bill, by announcing plans for an alternative government bill listing pregnancy as an aggravating factor in the commission of an assault on an expectant mother. In explaining the point of this initiative, Nicholson said: “Let me be clear, our government will not reopen the debate on abortion.”
Here we see the implacable resolve of the leading Conservatives as well the great majority of Liberals and New Democrats: That Canada shall retain the ignominious distinction among the world’s democracies of having no law to protect the right to life of children in the womb.
Barack Obama, the Democrat with the most liberal record in the United States Senate, is no less callous. While serving in the Illinois legislature, he voted against a bill passed by the majority that banned horrific partial-birth abortions. He also voted against a bill that mandated physicians to provide medical care for living, breathing babies who survive a botched abortion.
In contrast, Republican Senator John McCain supported the enactment of both kinds of life-saving legislation on the federal level. And he has solemnly pledged: “As President of the United States, I will be a pro-life president and this presidency will have pro-life policies.”
In a recent radio address, McCain decried Obama’s “extreme advocacy in favour of partial birth abortion and his refusal to provide medical care for babies surviving abortion” as a matter that “should be of grave concern to reasonable people of goodwill on both sides of this issue.”
McCain added: “There is a growing consensus in America that we need to overcome narrow partisanship on this issue for both women in need and the unborn. We need more of the compassion and moral idealism that my opponent’s own party, at its best, once stood for.”
Quite so. But what about Canada? Is there a growing consensus among Canadians about the urgent need to revive the compassion and moral idealism vital to protecting both women in need and the unborn?
Evidently not. It seems that most Canadians, like most of our politicians, have no compunction about abandoning women struggling with a difficult pregnancy to the guilt and pain of abortion. And none of our major party leaders shows any disposition to safeguard the lives of even healthy and viable babies either shortly before or after birth.
Our ancestors, both Liberals and Conservatives, would be appalled by such moral indifference. They understood the truth that we all have a moral obligation to help and defend even the last and the least and the most vulnerable of our fellow human beings—including babies in the womb.

Rory Leishman is an award-winning former full-time editorial writer and columnist at the London Free Press and has taught courses at the University of Western Ontario on Canadian federalism, Quebec politics and introductory political theory. Buy his book “Against Judicial Activism - The Decline of Freedom and Democracy in Canada through Amazon.ca.
• If you think PTBC has no value, then don't pay anything for it. It will fade into the sunset. That's the free market at work.
•
• Category: Rory Leishman +










