This week 59 years ago May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion read out the declaration proclaiming Israel’s independence.
Some six months earlier in November 1947 the UN voted for the partition of Palestine under British Mandate into two states, one Arab and one Jewish.
Jewish leaders accepted the UN resolution, while the Arab League representing Arab opinion repudiated the UN plan and refused to accept the making of modern Israel.
The history of this period, and of the decades preceding and following Israel’s re-birth, is layered with controversy, yet one dominant motif of this history stands out. Arab misery is in part a self-inflicted consequence of Arab vindictiveness toward Jews, making the Arab-Israeli dispute the most intractable of conflicts over the past 100 years and counting.
Arab refusal to accept Jewish rights to statehood has been accompanied by wars with the intent to annihilate Israel. Bigotry and hate toward Jews on the Arab side has masqueraded as religious edict, and then morphed into the sheer evil of indiscriminate suicide bombings.
Arabs have not been alone in their malice towards Jews and Israel. Big powers have also connived and colluded with Arab states to keep alive Arab-Muslim animus towards Israel.
Britain’s promise made to Jews in the Balfour Declaration of November 1917 laid the grounds for a Jewish home in the lands where God—so does the Koran (5:20-21) of the Muslims record—instructed Moses to take his people. It was from these lands and the temples Jews built to God that the Romans evicted them 2,000 years ago.
But when Jews, threatened in the 1930s with Hitler’s Final Solution for European Jewry needed most urgently support to find refuge, Britain imposed stringent restrictions on Jewish emigration into Palestine. If with British help—instead of London’s opposition to Jews and appeasement of Arabs—Israel had been founded 10 years earlier then many of those Jews who perished in the Holocaust would have survived.
An acceptance of Israel, at any time during the past six decades, would have made for permanent peace between two people claiming rights over the same lands. Israel’s peace treaties with Egypt (1979) and Jordan (1994) are instructive that neither nationalism nor religion are insurmountable obstacles to reaching an Arab-Israeli settlement on Palestine as proposed in the UN plan of 1947.
What is missing on the Arab side, in particular with Palestinians, is reasonableness, a quality amply demonstrated by Jews despite the anguish of their tragedy and the rightness of their claims to statehood. Unlike Arabs, Jews accepted what was offered by the UN in 1947 as the least good, and then worked hard to make the best of the circumstances provided.
Elias Khoury, a Palestinian-Christian writer, reflecting on the twists and turns of his native land comments, “Palestine isn’t a country for it to have a flag. Palestine is a condition. Every Arab is a Palestinian… Palestine is the condition of us all.” In other words, Palestine for Arabs is pathology or a rage and tribal call for rallying in an endless conflict with tribal enemies.
Israel’s success in building a modern economy within a democratic setting holds a mirror to the Arab-Muslim world’s abject failure to meet demands of the modern world with reasonableness.
Arab politics instead burns self-destructively with rage whether it is in the savagery of violence at display in Iraq, in the ethnic genocide unleashed in Darfur, or Palestinians shooting each other as the world watches in disbelief or wrong-headed sympathy.
He is a member of the Board of Directors for the Center for Islamic Pluralism based in Washington, D.C., a Senior Fellow with the Canadian Coalition for Democracies, and an academic-consultant with the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C. He has been a consultant with CIDA on development issues and has published widely in academic journals on foreign policy matters and area studies of the Middle East and South Asia.
Mansur is featured on the documentary Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West produced by the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He also unsuccessfully ran for the Canadian Alliance party in 2000.
Mansur has been accused by Canadian Islamic Congress of using "provocative, self-serving rhetoric", and for "promoting an anti-Arab and anti-Muslim agenda".
He is an Ismaili Muslim.
At a press conference on October 2, 2008, Mansur stated that "Islam is my private life, my conscience...[but] my faith does not take precedence over my duties...to Canada and its constitution, which I embrace freely;" "I am first and most importantly a Canadian;" "only in a free society will you find Islam as a faith and not a political religion." Mansur also criticized New Democratic Party Leader Jack Layton, whom Mansur said "has gone to bed with Islamists", because he is running candidates in Ontario and Quebec who are closely identified with the push for Sharia law.
- Israel: Decades-old conflict not about to cease - Saturday November 24, 2012 at 1:56 pm
- The better man lost the U.S. election - Saturday November 10, 2012 at 9:16 am
- The puzzle in U.S. presidential elections - Saturday November 3, 2012 at 8:43 am
